Optimization of Early Intervention in Probation Client Guidance Based On Compliance and Self Potential Exploration

Authors

  • Beatricia Ave Yoanne  Immigration and Correctional Polytechnic, Tangerang, Indonesia
  • Gangga Angel Ababil  Immigration and Correctional Polytechnic, Tangerang, Indonesia
  • Reza Agraha Kusuma Mardani Immigration and Correctional Polytechnic, Tangerang, Indonesia
  • Ridho Dinata  Immigration and Correctional Polytechnic, Tangerang, Indonesia
  • Muammar Hilmi Immigration and Correctional Polytechnic, Tangerang, Indonesia
  • Umar Anwar Immigration and Correctional Polytechnic, Tangerang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58526/ezrasciencebulletin.v4i2.639

Keywords:

Client START Program, Probation and Parole Office, Correctional Clients, Initial Assessment, Correctional Guidance, Preventive Intervention.

Abstract

This article discusses the implementation of the Client START Program as an early intervention for correctional clients at the Class II Probation and Parole Office (Bapas) in Kediri. The program was initiated in response to the limited understanding among some clients regarding their rights, obligations, responsibilities, legal consequences, and compliance with mandatory reporting requirements. The study employed a descriptive qualitative approach based on Community Service Learning (KKN) activities. Data were collected through observation, discussions, assessments, documentation, and program implementation. The activities included orientation, completion of assessment instruments, exploration of personal potential, group discussions, preparation of personal development plans, and an introduction to the services provided by the Probation and Parole Office. The program involved 16 correctional inmates and 52 newly registered clients. The findings indicate that the program helped provide clients with essential initial information while identifying their individual needs and potential. The increase in the number of revocations of social reintegration programs, from 97 clients in June 2026 to 108 clients in July 2026, highlights the importance of strengthening preventive interventions and individualized guidance provided by Probation Officers.

Author Biography

Muammar Hilmi, Immigration and Correctional Polytechnic, Tangerang, Indonesia

    Immigration and Correctional Polytechnic, Tangerang, Indonesia

  1. Muammar Hilmi – [email protected]

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Fahriza, R. (2020). Optimalisasi tugas dan fungsi Pembimbing Kemasyarakatan dalam upaya pencegahan overcrowded di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan. Reformasi Hukum, 24(2), 130–149. https://doi.org/10.46257/jrh.v24i2.102

Fajriando, H. (2019). Evaluasi pelaksanaan community-based corrections di Lapas Terbuka Kelas III Rumbai. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 13(3), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2019.v13.323-338

Hendro Setiyono, A. M., & Iskandar, I. S. (2025). Pelaksanaan community based corrections: Studi kasus di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Terbuka Kelas IIB Nusakambangan. Esensi Hukum, 7(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.35586/esensihukum.v7i1.476

Hermawan, A. A., & Subroto, M. (2022). Implementasi community based correction sebagai model pembinaan terhadap narapidana. NUSANTARA: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 9(8), 2759–2766. https://doi.org/10.31604/jips.v9i8.2022.2759-2766

Nugraha, A. (2020). Konsep community based corrections pada sistem pemasyarakatan dalam menghadapi dampak pemenjaraan. Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora, 4(1), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.22437/jssh.v4i1.9778

Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1983). Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: Toward an integrative model of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51(3), 390–395.

Rachma, A. A., & Ravizki, E. N. (2025). Upaya Balai Pemasyarakatan dalam menghadapi hambatan klien pemasyarakatan yang hilang pada saat pembimbingan. Rewang Rencang: Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 6(7).

Rinaldi, R., Madjid, N. V., & Fahmiron. (2025). Efektivitas pelaksanaan pencabutan hak program integrasi bagi klien terhadap tingkat pengulangan tindak pidana. Ekasakti Legal Science Journal, 2(4), 389–396.

Samudra, I. W. (2021). Efektivitas kerjasama pihak ketiga dalam proses pembinaan warga binaan berbasis masyarakat (Community Based Corrections) Lapas Terbuka Nusakambangan. Jurnal Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.22373/justisia.v6i2.1153

Republik Indonesia. (2022). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 22 Tahun 2022 tentang Pemasyarakatan.

Downloads

Published

2026-11-13

How to Cite

Yoanne, B. A., Ababil, G. A., Mardani, R. A. K., Dinata, R., Hilmi, M., & Anwar, U. (2026). Optimization of Early Intervention in Probation Client Guidance Based On Compliance and Self Potential Exploration. EZRA SCIENCE BULLETIN, 4(2), 1086–1095. https://doi.org/10.58526/ezrasciencebulletin.v4i2.639